Community Impact Assessment


New Bethel Baptist Church, Crest Street, Durham, North Carolina

Community Mitigation and Enhancement: Crest Street, Durham, North Carolina


What Happened

Planning for the East-West Expressway began in 1959 (see chronology below). The highway was intended to provide access to a corridor characterized by high employment density, including the Durham central business district, major nearby manufacturers, and the Duke University Medical complex. The route was to generally follow the Southern Railroad tracks through the city, where increasing congestion was hampering the city's growth.

Several urban-renewal programs were undertaken during the 1960s in conjunction with the East-West corridor. Many households and businesses were relocated at a time when relocation benefits were limited, and many relocated residents accused the city of mot keeping promises it had made. A major African-American community, known as Hayti, was virtually dismantled by a combination of urban renewal and the East-West Expressway, resulting in long-term resentment and distrust of government agencies among African-American residents of Durham.

The Crest Street neighborhood was the next African-American community to face the prospect of relocation. Beginning in the 1960s, Crest Street residents became active in opposing efforts to complete the East-West Expressway, which was already being delayed because of funding problems. They clearly recognized that, if implemented as planned, the proposed highway would be a threat that their neighborhood would not survive.

Opposition by the Crest Street neighborhood was noticed early because, throughout Durham, this large African-American neighborhood had achieved a significant degree of economic and political power over the years. Crest Street residents were able to effectively use their long-term connections and respect in the Durham area to develop political alliances with sympathetic activist groups such as ECOS (a Duke University group that was fighting the expressway for environmental reasons). An important milestone was reached in 1973, when ECOS achieved a court decision that required NCDOT and FHWA to prepare an EIS to comply with NEPA.

During the preparation of the EIS in the mid-1970s, NCDOT, FHWA, and the city of Durham worked together to prepare a restructuring plan for Crest Street. This plan, which would have dispersed Crest Street residents throughout the city, was actively opposed by the Crest Street neighborhood. In 1977, the Crest Street neighborhood was declared eligible to receive legal aid from the North-Central Legal Assistance Program. The help pf legal-aid attorneys was crucial to Crest Street residents' ability to make themselves heard.

Project Chronology

1959    East-West Expressway appears in the thoroughfare            plans of North Carolina Department of Transportation            (NCDOT) and the city of Durham, NC.

1967    Construction begins.

1970    First expressway segment opens.

1973    NCDOT is required to prepare an Environmental Impact            Statement (EIS) for the remaining expressway            construction.

1975    Crest Street Community Council (CSCC) is formed.

1977    CSCC obtains assistance from North-Central Legal-            Assistance Program attorneys.

1978    CSCC files a Title VI administrative complaint with U.S.            DOT alleging racial discrimination; NCDOT completes            the Draft EIS; Duke sociological survey is conducted.

1980    U.S. DOT issues a preliminary ruling that the proposed            East-West Expressway alignment is discriminatory; the            Steering Committee is established; another survey is            commissioned.

1981    Small Task Force convenes and begins negotiations for            community-impact mitigation and enhancement plan.

1982    Final mitigation and enhancement plan is agreed to by            CSCC, city of Durham, NCDOT, and the Federal            Highway Administration (FHWA); Final EIS is            completed; Record of Decision is issued by FHWA.

1986    Construction of the new Crest Street neighborhood is            completed.

1992    Final East-West Expressway construction is            completed.

1996    Crest Street neighborhood celebrates its 10th            anniversary and continues to sustain its cohesiveness            and strong leadership.

The Crest Street neighborhood was able to obtain the services of experts to assist them on technical issues during the development of the East-West Expressway. For example, a qualified traffic engineer offered credible counter-arguments to NCDOT proposals. In 1978, a sociological survey of the community was carried out by a Duke University group. The findings of that survey, while disputed at the time, were subsequently validated by a survey commissioned by a project Steering Committee in 1980. These surveys were important in convincing people of the value of preserving the Crest Street neighborhood.

In 1978, the Crest Street Community Council, assisted by legal-aid attorneys, filed a Title VI administrative complaint with the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) alleging racial discrimination in the planning of the East-West Expressway project. Today, most parties agree that this complaint and the resultant favorable ruling by the Office of Civil Rights of USDOT in 1980 were the critical elements in making FHWA, NCDOT, and the city enter into serious negotiations with the Crest Street neighborhood.

A series of meetings was convened among all parties, including a representative from FHWA's Headquarters Office, Washington, D.C. These meetings established the basic structure for formulating the collaborative process that developed a comprehensive mitigation and enhancement plan for the Crest Street neighborhood. Objectives and structure were established, including a technical operating committee (the "Task Force") composed of representatives from the Crest Street Community Council and the principal public agencies and private organizations involved in the project, including FHWA; and a Steering Committee composed of Task Force members, top government officials, and private interest groups. Although the process was interrupted for 11 months to resolve a zoning dispute in the Crest Street neighborhood, the basic structure help up and resulted in completion of a comprehensive mitigation and enhancement plan in 1982.

The completion of the East-West Expressway had become a volatile and racially charged political issue in the city of Durham. Several elections turned on the issue. In the end, however, the Durham City/County Planning Department began developing a mitigation and enhancement plan with NCDOT and FHWA.

The most encouraging and inspiring part of the Crest Street Story is the evolution of the mitigation effort. The working environment changed in the space of less than 2 years from angry and adversarial to a spirit of cooperation and mutual respect rarely, if ever, found in negotiations among opposing parties on a highway or other type of project.

The Players

Task Force Members (developed community impact mitigation plan):

Crest Street Community Council (and their legal     counsel, the North-Central Legal Assistance     Program)
Duke University
City of Durham (the Durham City/County Planning     Department)
Federal Highway Adminstration, North Carolina     Division Office, Raleigh, NC
North Carolina Department of Transportation

Steering Committee Members (set preliminary structure for problem resolution; provided oversight of relocation planning process):

Task Force Members
Durham Committee on the Affairs of Black People
Federal Highway Administration, Headquarters     Office, Washington, DC
The Peoples Alliance (an environmental coalition     opposed to the project)

Other Parties

ECOS (a group of Duke University Law School     students opposed to the project)
The Durham Voter's Alliance (involved in the City     Council elections and politics in Durham as it     related to the project)

The community leaders offered the church fellowship hall--the center of most community activity--as a place to hold project related meetings. The neutral, convenient site, along with some refreshments provided by the hosts, created a friendly, relaxed setting for discussions and reasoned negotiations.

Credit is due to all who were involved in the collaborative process. Both NCDOT and FHWA made sure that the right personnel were assigned to do the job properly. The Crest Street neighborhood extended courtesies to the project task force that led to a friendly meeting environment in which real progress was possible. The agencies' representatives were chosen to participate, it seemed, on their ability to get along with people and to get things done. They were also empowered to make decisions independently and in a timely manner.


Introduction
Previous |  Next